Pakistani Idiot of the Year 2019: Faisal Vawda

Source: thecurrent.pk

Well, it should not come as a surprise, given we have had the government of idiots complete its first year and still going as erratic as ever, which was a big win for idiots all across Pakistan. Even though the entire cabinet is a great congress of idiots, but the minister that embodies it the most has to be none other than Faisal Vawda, who is the Pakistani Idiot of the Year 2019.

The self-pompous, narcissistic, and Vawda is ironically everything that the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf has been claiming to loathe. Unfortunately, he has become the symbol of irresponsibility, indiscipline, and yes, financial corruption, as well as the embodiment of the personality cult mentality which the party suffers from already under the leadership of Imran Khan.

Source: twitter

However, apart from his usual antics, such as flashing expensive sports cars and heavy-duty sports motorcycles, and posing with the Pakistani soldiers on the Line of Control after the airforce downed an Indian MiG 21, he earns the title by pushing as the official position of the PTI government on corruption. Vawda had infamously stated on Hamid Mir’s TV show that hanging 500 people in the country will resolve its problems.

In his latest gem, he says that Ahsan Iqbal should be hanged for “three days.” However, it is strange that a party endorsing such penalties had such a strong reaction to the inappropriate final paragraph of the Musharraf verdict.

In a recent blog, I have talked about the hypocrisy of Pakistani social conservatives when it comes to “public hangings.” Of course, it is idiotic to endorse mass public hangings, if not stonings, but this is the narrative that drives even the mainstream conservative nationalists in Pakistan. The only difference is that they are okay with having their military carry out the job behind closed doors. Perhaps, the greatest symbol of that is the insane public intellectual Hassan Nisar, who disgraced himself by openly and shamelessly defending the financial corruption of former dictator General Pervez Musharraf.

Therefore, Vawda is the idiot who had delivered the message but it was by no means an isolated statement. The Prime Minister has already expressed his intention in China of implementing such a law if he had enough power, which was among many of his idiotic moments of the year including a bizarre speech threatening nuclear war at the United Nations, stating that the Pakistani military had trained Al-Qaida at a US foreign policy forum. It’s no surprise he has dodged a blasphemy accusation due to all his Messianic but loose Medina State talk. Here is the “Prime Minister” mimicking Opposition leader Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari on a national inauguration event.

There is no shortage of other idiocy that made Pakistan proud. As a matter of fact, the instances and statements are so numerous and outrageous, covering all those is simply beyond the scope of this post. It may even prove too overwhelming for a journalist or a historian to chronicle those in a journal. However, a few prominent ones need special mentions.

In the first quarter of the year, the Law Minister of Punjab Fayyaz-ul-Hassan Chauhan had opened his year-long account of idiotic behavior by responding to India’s aggression toward Kashmir. It is no secret that society in general and the government in Pakistan, in particular, are anti-Hindu. Chauhan, despite bearing a last name that clearly shows his Hindu ancestry, determine

In another instance of their anti-Hindu bigotry, another PTI minister Ali Muhammad Khan, who had shamed a Hindu MP for presenting a bill in the Parliament. It is important to remind that this is the same government that accuses the Modi administration to be Nazis day and night and also has a problem with the controversial Citizenship Amendment Act in India. Following all the bigotry, there was hardly a surprise that anti-Hindu riots were ignited in Sindh, this time conveniently blamed on “blasphemy.”

The entire cabinet of PTI sounded like a band of buffoons and who else but Fawad Chaudhary could consistently produce. In one of his infinite bizarre statements,

Fellow Islamists, the Emir of Jamat-i-Islami, Siraj-ul-Haq offered his brilliant vision of expanding his political party, by encouraging his party workers to give birth to more children.

Even though Mufti Kifayatullah was obviously joking, his hilariously ridiculous comment that the Vicky of “Wikileaks” is the cousin of Jemima Goldsmith, Imran Khan’s first wife. It is important to explain that the comment was not antisemitic, unlike popular belief. But it surely earns him a mention and allows me to bash another cleric.

While this post may come across comical, it never always is. The dark side of the idiocy of this nation shows its face in the form of the blasphemy zealots from Khadim Hussain Rizvi of TLP to numerous foot soldiers across the country indoctrinated by Barelvism. One such young dangerous idiot was Khateeb Hussain who murdered an English professor in Bahawalpur for something he decided was a blasphemy.

https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fphoto.php%3Ffbid%3D2133535140270821%26set%3Da.1403423473281995%26type%3D3&width=500

In the similar spirit, the rioting lawyers stormed a cardiac hospital in Lahore this December and were responsible for more than one deaths. Hasaan Niazi of the ISF, who had later repented, along with the mob of lawyers, make the list for the sheer madness they helped instigated.

Another special mention goes out to Maj. Gen. Asif Ghafoor, the Director General of ISPR, who has pretty much established that the qualification for future appointments to the post will need you to be a professional troll. Please see the following tweets and make up your own mind.

Like always, apologies for missing out hundreds of other idiots. Please feel free to add to the list in the comments.

Read about the Pakistani idiot of the year for 2018 here.

Sympathy for the Devil: Comment on the Milo-Maher Episode

Source: LA Times

Source: LA Times

There is a reason I am a bigger fan of Bill Maher than any other liberal comedian/political activist out there. Actually, his show is the only one where almost everyone gets a platform and where you can find some substance in the middle of the usual political insults.

I personally find his show very interesting for always evenly distributing the panelists among liberals and conservatives, and particularly for his much needed unfiltered criticism of religion. Seriously, without the likes of him, the Western left would have no remote clue what Islam and Sharia could really look like. Not that they would care anyway.

I know a lot of people don’t find him funny because his jokes are perceivably too rude, crude and offensive for them. But somehow I do, even when I find his jokes offensive. And that is probably because I know that Bill Maher, who has been called “nominally liberal,” hears the other side out. Even though, only to insult them to their faces. All in good humor.

I wanted to avoid commenting on this primarily because of some of the terrible opinions held by Milo, but thought it would be inappropriate to skip this considering what it means in terms of free speech. It would also be a tremendous disservice to the readers of this blog.

I consider myself somewhat a free speech libertarian, not a liberal. What that means is that I would be willing to give a platform to a lot of ideas and speech that would be off-limits to most decent circles of the society. Even though, in real life, I would avoid engaging those ideas in conversation, especially if I personally do not believe in them.

For example, I would listen to a meninist, as opposed to a feminist, but I would know that they are full of shit. Because women are simply at a tremendous disadvantage both socially and economically, and to my mind even physically, in what is still a man’s world. But nothing wrong in challenging third wave feminism and it should not be off-limits because at least its criticism of art certainly has a flaw or too.

But when I hear about the gender wage gap from a feminist, I would listen to the arguments with a healthy economic skepticism. Which is a polite way of saying that I need to learn more about this burning issue and that perhaps, some day, I would be able to form a strong opinion on this issue.

But I must say, I find Milo Yiannapoulous intriguing. And I don’t even have to agree with his politics or views on things. I know, it is about that for most people. But I seldom see people that way, unless sometimes they force me not to. Though Milo does come close, but it is still important to hear out before dismissing. And I am sure the same is true for Bill Maher.

His views on transgenders are absolutely disgusting, terming transgenderism a mental disease. But probably what is worse about him is that he has become somewhat of a professional troll. He still is voicing some very unpopular opinions in the public with. But it strikes a chord with a lot of people because in their perception the liberals have gone a bit too far off the rails.

But probably what is worse about him is that he has become somewhat of a professional troll. He still is voicing some very unpopular opinions in the public with. But it strikes a chord with a lot of people because in their perception the liberals have gone a bit too far off the rails.

Bill Maher, of course, was rebuked viciously by progressive liberals for inviting him on his show, some of who are announcing their boycotts, as usual.  Frequent panelist journalist Jeremy Scahill was supposed to appear on that show but pulled out. How could he give the poster child of Alt-Right a platform on his show? Well, he also happened to be the Editor of Breitbart News at the time. The founder of the platform, Andrew Breitbart, a very outspoken provocateur himself, often appeared on the show. Milo looks somewhat of a resurrection of the late outspoken libertarian blogger.

Now, here are two ways to look at this. Either you are giving a troll a mainstream platform and audience, or you are simply exposing him to further scrutiny.

I had heard his name alright, but I had no idea what his deal was about until I saw him on Bill Maher’s show. And realized that Bill Maher indeed had given him a bigger platform for many. Though not for the first time, as he has appeared on Sky and BBC several times in the UK.

Milo Yiannapoulous has been insightful, particularly in his explanation of the Trump Presidency phenomenon. Not even the biggest of pundits ever realized that the Presidency of his “daddy” was won on a cultural platform. Which explains a candidate that is so bullet-proof that the release of his “grab them by the pussy” video failed to destroy his candidacy. How can historians explain this? Other than the Republican voter base completely lacking morals, which they often accuse the liberals of

Though here is the other side of the picture. It was because of Bill Maher’s show that both Milo and he were bombarded with hate blogs and reports on the liberal and mainstream media such as CNN. In other words, Bill Maher took Milo to CNN.

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

And the intense attention that it brought led to the re-emergence, or rather emergence, of a long lost tape of an internet show in which he seems to be justifying homosexual men engaging in sexual contact with minors. Following it up with a joke about having sex with his priest.

Well, well. You thought that Milo would actually be with his signature bravado, but not to be. He held a press conference regretting his “poor choice of words,” something he had never done before I assume. He resigned his position as Breitbart Senior Editor, possibly being forced to, which he made look like a voluntary one. Before that, the deal for his book “Dangerous” was canceled.

But ideologically worst of all, he lost his speaking spot in the CPAC. That must have been a huge blow to his fans.

Later, Bill Maher was taking credit, saying “you’re welcome.” If that sounds douchey, well, only Bill Maher can attain those levels. But he may have a point there. Sunlight, indeed, is the best disinfectant.

So Bill Maher’s delusions aside, what happened? Why was this comment the last straw that broke the camel’s back? Despite everything and everything Milo had said and done, including reportedly donning Nazi paraphernalia, Islamophobia and making antisemitic remarks,. An article by Nathan J. Robinson asked this question too. And I tell you what, his comments appearing on the video regarding the age of consent are nothing new and not nearly as shocking as you would believe. Even though I believe the age of consent is a legitimate debate and varies in different regions, I guess the conservatives draw a line when it comes to pedophilia, especially when a gay man is involved. And I am not even sure if these cases even qualify for the wildly thrown around term pedophilia, which is supposed to be classified as a mental disorder. Underage sex or statutory rape, yes.

Actually, a lot of websites are accusing Maher himself of justifying an older woman having sexual relations with a minor and not rejecting the idea that women could possibly rape men. But I guess for someone who has a problem with Prophet Muhammad marrying a minor, raise this issue all you want. Well, send me a memo please but I don’t think it destroyed Maher’s career. HBO must be aware of it. I guess the only shit he faced was because of his 9/11 comments.

Before this episode, Milo Yiannapoulos was invited by the College Republicans in the UC Berkeley campus in California. This led to some of the most vicious violent riots the United States has seen in the recent years. One of such riots in Seattle saw a person shot. On Van Jones’ show, the one who had invited him said he was worried for his life during the episode. It was this incident that prompted Bill Maher to invite Milo to his show because he happens to have a problem with left’s hypocrisy, hate of free speech and love of safe spaces too.

Like Bill, I sided with Milo on that and had absolutely zero problems with him appearing on his show. The left media went berserk, of course.

According to the hysteric Jezebel, Bill Maher was a monster now. The others shredded him for basically enabling Milo and not calling him out on the more offensive parts of his comments. Even though Maher himself is barely as progressive socially as many would like to believe. He grew up with old school comedians and perhaps could be considered as the heir to George Carlin for his caustic humor.

Though I do admit that he was clearly doing it for the most part. But still, I would not divorce Bill Maher from the ranks of my political allies. Be glad that a comedian and political activist like that is on your side. Though eventually, you would feel, the left-leaning Democratic Party would eventually drive out anyone. If only the Republicans were not so horrible.

In the end, I like Milo’s style but I can have no sympathy at all for the terrible political opinions he stands for. But I am not bothered much about his moral unorthodoxy. Actually, I am attracted to it, because I can relate to the boundaries that he is trying to push and it is fun to see him getting under the skin of so many whose righteousness we take for granted.

I must say I am intrigued by Milo because I am interested in people who question moral conventions. And more often than not, it requires being offensive and some courage as well. But pushing the limits of moral boundaries is something that could really start some new debates. Though I am not sure how well he qualifies for this great mission.

But while social justice wars are all good, it is important not to forget the essential right of free speech, which is the most important human right of all. And most of all, he reminds us of how much self-censorship is prevalent in the age of information, though it is not necessarily a bad thing. But it sure is dishonest.

This is one of the primary reasons I have never identified as a “progressive” as yet, though being an ally on most issues including feminism, and most probably never would.