The Horror of a Vulnerable Minority

Source: iAfrica.com

The horrifying and shocking Christchurch mosque attack has forced the world to witness from the viewpoint of an oppressor what the misery of being a vulnerable minority is. After this, can you ever guarantee if any place in the world is safe for you to pray?

The valiant efforts of reassurances and condolences by the New Zealand premier are not enough and not even needed, as appreciable as they are, but she hardly knows better. She simply does not know how to reconcile with the brutal reality of the vicious, violent politics of some in her ethnic community, even living in supposedly quiet, utopian countries such as New Zealand. New Zealand responded with compassion and shock, especially the Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, though there is little mention of her own xenophobic stand.

Just imagine how the innocent Muslims praying on a quiet Christchurch Friday in the mosque would have felt like when they had heard gunfire in its halls. But probably they should not have dropped their guard like that. They took the peace and tranquility of the quiet Christchurch town for granted. The mosque attacker, who was clearly a White Nationalist, had made his intentions clear beforehand on a facebook post about the crime he was going to commit. Muslims cannot breathe in peace in the West, even in the remote and tranquil New Zealand.

Source: wp.com

I would really like to make a part of the debate something that hardly ever sees the light of day and which needs to take place among conservative, liberal, and secular Muslims. And that is how tragedies such as these are politically used to repel political scrutiny into their social and theocratic positions. The left progressives in the West are obviously the greatest allies to them in sheltering their ideologies. This is where the following interview of Canadian Muslim journalist Tarek Fatah, a noted dissident from mainstream Islam, is of paramount importance. Because the absence of this side of the argument will be intellectual dishonesty. I commend Tarek Fatah for his courage.

 

Meanwhile, most people around the world, even in the modern Indian Republic with their preoccupation of hate for Pakistan, continue to ignore the constant fear. Even this Holi, two Hindu women, Reena and Raveena have been abducted by an unknown mob while injuring their family members. This happens just about every other month in Sindh.

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

And of course, the constantly abused Christian community in Pakistan, even in Islamabad.

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Nobody in Pakistan seems to care about the continual targeting and murder of the Ahmedi community. Two more Ahmedi doctors were recently killed and their bodies found near Fateh Jung, in the outskirts of Islamabad.

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

It is a tragedy how innocent people fall victim to the extremism of all kinds.

This is our Christchurch too. The difference is that it happens all year round. And closet Jamatiyas who would accuse liberals to be quiet about the atrocities of White Nationalists would willfully ignore this in the name of supporting an Islamic Republic.

And when a Prime Minister in Pakistan tries to become Jacinda Ardern, an anti-immigration politician who is the new hero of Muslim conservatives, he is instantly dubbed an infidel and a traitor.

The Questions You Should Not Ask

Source: AP/HBO

Source: AP/HBO

In recent days, a clip from Real Time with Bill Maher has been circulating all over the social media, and even in news publications. The clip is about the confrontation between Academy Award winning actor and director Ben Affleck and atheist scholar and neuroscientist Sam Harris.

Well, no introduction to the clip needed.

                               Source: HBO

This brief confrontation led to a number of critiques, both on Ben Affleck and Maher and Harris. The primary criticism on the latter was about their Islamophobia and bigotry. In comparison, Affleck was attacked for not being thoughtful in the debate.

There is little doubt about the fact that Ben Affleck was emotional form the word go, and Sam Harris even claimed he was “gunning for him from the start.” But in short, Affleck lost his cool and should have acted in a saner manner.

But instead of wasting our time with Affleck calling Maher and  Harris “racist”, which they most probably are (who cares), let’s focus on the other side of the debate.

You could argue that both of them have been displaying behavior toward Muslims, which could be termed hostile by many. Despite their claims that they do not engage in Islamophobia.

What is noteworthy is that most of their critics completely ignore their objection on tolerance of cruel and illiberal fundamental beliefs among Muslims. And the questions they raise are:

  • What is the punishment for apostasy in Islam?
  • What is the punishment for adultery in Islam?
  • What is the punishment for blasphemy in Islam?

The answer to all three questions happen to be death, like it or not.

These are the questions that you should not ask.

Even the recent opinion article from religion apologist and scholar Reza Aslan, who claims the moral high ground by saying that both sides lacked sophistication.

Curiously, that eloquent article conveniently lacked any mention of those questions, which kills the criticism on Maher and Harris for someone who is familiar with their rhetoric.

Now this could put some serious questions in the minds of someone who would actually want to disagree with them.

But yet another problem with this is that those who have already picked a side would not be prepared to change their minds. However, from my own experience, I know it is not true for everyone.

What Maher and Harris mean is that we probably have a big problem when that many Muslims actually believe in fundamental beliefs that have no room in a modern Western civilization. And which are simply unacceptable by any standard but their own.

And especially because their population makes up such a significant portion of the world population. So why not talk about it and take a step toward sorting this issue.

However, asking these very questions have become unacceptable in the unwritten rules of the Western progressive liberals. While they accuse people like Sam Harris to be indulging in bigotry and Islamophobia in the guise of criticizing religion, they could be accused of tolerating illiberal and even dangerously brutal beliefs in their eagerness to avoid being xenophobes as well.

So what is the solution?

How are you going to confront most Muslims for their irresponsible beliefs that they would gladly defend?

Should you just shut up because that’s racist?