Our public inquisitors and blasphemy scanners, who have taken it upon themselves to inform the public of every little mischievous soul taking the Lord’s name in vain, are dominating the TV waves.
The biggest problem is who would decide that it is a blasphemy.
The answer is simple. The public inquisitors and blasphemy scanners themselves.
The rule is simple too.
If it looks like a blasphemy, and if it sounds like a blasphemy to certain people, rest assured that it is.
Hey, I am not even presenting the same old liberal argument of insanity or fake profiles. Let’s talk about things that people actually say.
Even Hamza Ali Abbasi asking about the rights of a minority community is considered blasphemy in this day and age.
Thou shalt not question the Second Amendment, even if you are not really doing so.
This is hilarious and dangerous at the same time.
In the Indian subcontinent, one of the perks of living in a society with so many religions is that people are just so easy to offend.
You would feel as if you were watching the moral policing version of the Hunger Games on your TV.
The only difference is that in the Hunger Games, the condemned contestants actually stand a chance to save their lives by winning.
We are witnessing a race on national TV to nominate blasphemers and waiting for the faithful to take them out. It’s a thrilling game of survival.
It may come across as free speech but it is precisely the very opposite, because this sort of behavior is not only meant to shut people up. It is meant to shut them up for good. As in the case of the murdered Bangladeshi bloggers.
Now do not forget, such behavior comes from this taken-for-granted belief that the society needs to think in a certain way, and anything and everything must be done to silence the deviants.
Our former philosopher-kings such as Orya Maqbool Jan and the inquisitor-in-chief Mubasher Lucman, who often pretends not to be concerned with others’ private affairs, are just the prominent faces of this reality witch-hunting show.
Blasphemy and public morality scanners have a certain goal in mind.
It’s not that such elements are not present on the liberal side of the political spectrum, but their goal is usually confined to naming and shaming. They get their orgasms out of people being publicly humiliated instead of offering allusions that people could hack you to death when out of control.
Many of my naïve friends ask me why secularism is needed in the presence of an Islamic state, not to be confused with the menacing political entity in Iraq and Syria.
With public inquisitors in charge, whose tone claim authority over the national discourse, considering atheism as rebellion to the Constitution of Pakistan, you do need secularism.
You need secularism because otherwise even existing could have serious consequences in an Islamic State, again not to confuse with the menacing political entity in Iraq and Syria.
In my opinion, witch hunters such as Orya Maqbool Jan and Mubasher Lucman themselves are the biggest argument in favor of secularism.
Because apparently, the very existence of a community in a country is a source of offense to the supposed view of the majority.
Now don’t bring up Jinnah’s view, please. Haven’t we trashed that already with the 1973 constitution?
Now as entertaining as they are, the blasphemy hunger games are nevertheless dangerous.
They are dangerous because not only are they intellectually bankrupt, but also socially authoritarian.
Sometimes, I do feel sorry for the people on the religious conservative side of the fence. Because the very presentation of their ideological view involves violating others’ free speech and personal security. And that is precisely how theocratic forces have been enforcing their view for centuries.
However, this does not absolve them of their sheer idiocy, lack of information, moral hypocrisy, and malicious intentions.
But since it is an Islamic State, the Blasphemy Hunger Games must go on.
The post was originally published in The Nation blogs.
Filed under: Commentary | Tagged: 1973 Constitution of Pakistan, Ahmedis, atheism, blasphemy, blasphemy law, free speech, freedom of expression, Hamza Ali Abbasi, inquisitor, Islam, Jinnah, liberal, moral policing, morality, Mubasher Lucman, Muslims, Orya Maqbool Jan, Pakistan, religious conservative, Second Amendment, Secularism, social authoritarianism, survival, The Hunger Games | Leave a comment »