I have observed that most Pakistani secularists find the idea of talks with the Taliban nauseating. However, a new window of opportunity has dawned for their cause by the turn of events in the past weeks.
The religious conservatives of the country have really put themselves in an awkward position by making practical steps to negotiate with the Taliban.
The Taliban have made their lives even more difficult. They have responded by demanding the imposition of Shariah Law throughout the country and have rejected the constitution. Curiously, these are demands that are not even acceptable to most conservative parties, except for the extreme religious groups.
This makes a common Muslim wonder why would there be such resistance to a system that they have been taught is the solution to every ill in the world. How are the likes of Maulana Abdul Aziz wrong in their insistence that the obvious demand of Shariah imposition should not even be a matter of debate.
What, then, is making the Pakistani political leadership so suspicious about Shariah imposition?
Even though every Muslim is supposed to be an Islamist, the fact remains that an overwhelming majority of them are not.
At least not in Pakistan.
Their lifestyle, their customs, their way of life and their voting patterns, all suggest that they want nothing to do with Shariah Law.
Pakistanis watch movies, love music and love to dance. They may indulge in a lot of social ills, but they would have problems with someone blowing up music shops and telling the women of their family how to cover themselves. They also like to shave and do not mind skipping their prayers.
They also do not seem to be prepared to sacrifice their almost Western lifestyle in cities and traditional ways in rural areas to embrace an 8th century code of life.
To them, Shariah is a word that must be revered and must not be challenged, but it really has no place in their lives.
While the Taliban have reminded the people of Pakistan of what Shariah is, it is the perfect time to convert them against this threatening and authoritarian ideology.
At least it is time to ask some tough questions about Shariah, if we must not get too carried away with our ambition.
And make no mistake about it, it can be done in the most discreet and polite manner.
There is no harm in asking them why they would want to support something they do not practice. There is no harm in asking why they would not embrace Shariah as it is if they are Muslims, and why would they reject secularism then.
Everyone can start with their near and dear ones. I ask my family this question everyday, and no, it would not get you killed if you do it respectfully. Charity begins at home and it can easily be propagated to bigger platforms through leading secular opinion leaders.
They would surely shy away from the taboo subject. Surely, they would find it hard to step out of the reassuring shelter of faith, but a little perseverance could pay well.
This is the first step to win the battle against the Taliban. And the first step to convince people why proactively countering the indoctrination of Islamism is essential to their liberty, peace and way of life.
This is the perfect time to reiterate that secularism will prove to be the best social contract to resolve the multitude of religious problems. This is something politicians on right and left must agree on.
It is the perfect time to offer reason to those who are willing to take it.
But don’t get me wrong. This is not a time to build fences. It is not a time to merely win debates and score ideological points.
It is a time to win hearts and minds. We must overcome our curmudgeonly cynicism to see that perspective.
Even in the darkest of thunderstorms, there is always that silver lining.
Filed under: Commentary | Tagged: code of life, Constitution, culture, Debate, hope, ideology, Islam, law, liberty, Maulana Abdul Aziz, negotiations, Pakistan, Peace, politics, religion, Secularism, Shariah, taboo, Taliban, war | Leave a comment »